Menu
Articles and Presentations

Matthew Fortin Examines the Most Notable Illinois Insurance Rulings from Q2 in Law360

8.7.2026

BatesCarey partner Matthew Fortin breaks down three Illinois appellate auto insurance opinions from the second quarter of 2026 in his recent article for Law360. His analysis addresses employee-driver coverage under employers' commercial auto policies, notice deadlines in personal auto policies, and the shrinking path to recovery when an insurer delays paying an Underinsured Motorist (UIM) claim.

Key takeaways from the article include:

  • Whether an employee driving their own vehicle can claim coverage under an employer's commercial auto policy now depends on which district hears the case, and on whether the claimant chose to sue the employer at all. In Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Witbrod, the Appellate Court of Illinois’ Second District declined to follow the First District's 2015 decision in First Chicago Insurance Co. v. Molda, leaving the outcome largely in the claimant's hands—unless the Illinois Supreme Court resolves the split.
  • Insurers can no longer treat a fixed notice deadline as an automatic coverage defense. In the first published Illinois appellate decision on the question, American Alliance Casualty Co. v. Aguirre, the First District held that even a clear 30-day requirement is measured against the Livorsi reasonableness factors, though a sufficiently unreasonable delay still defeats coverage without any showing of prejudice.
  • Paying a UIM claim, even after years of delay, does not by itself expose an insurer to Section 155 damages. Becker-Othman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. confirms that a Section 155 claim must rest on a live breach of an express policy obligation, leaving insureds with a narrow path to extracontractual relief.

Together, the quarter's rulings settle some hotly contested questions while leaving others wide open. Insurers and policyholders come away with clearer expectations around notice and a narrower path to extracontractual relief, but a firm answer on when an employee driving a personal vehicle can claim coverage under an employer's commercial auto policy has yet to be provided.

Click here for the full article. 

Matt Fortin is a partner who has spent his career investigating, litigating, and advising clients in all manner of claims and coverage matters.